4 Comments

We understood what we saw differently. We were told that they had 100% of the surveillance footage for states where this had been recorded. So for states where they had it, they could - according to their claim - show the same person going to box after box. If they cannot do this, they can be sued for making false claims.

However, I do not expect a film to take me along, seeing one person after another doing illegal drop-offs.

As far as I have heard, they are going to publish, within the next day or so, the exact location of all the pick-up places - all "charity" places, I believe.

I agree they should do everything to back their claims.

On the other hand, if they cannot back their claims, I believe they can be sued massively.

I do believe it would have been more effective if they had shown, say five people, in very short clips (3 secs, perhaps) doing 10 or more consecutive drop-offs.

Expand full comment
author

I don't think that they can be sued because they were careful not to point the blame at any individuals. I agree that what you suggest would have been more effective!

Expand full comment

I will do my best to reach them. At the very least, a second short video could be done - funny, having one mule after another tracked speeded up, one ping data after another tracked speeded up. Here's a short video I've done, after a friend told me of a little-known bit of important Islamic ideology. It's hard to convey, he said. My reply: I could explain it to five-year old. The bit of ideology: al Walaa wal Baraa. My easy, simple, clear explanation, aimed at kids 8 and over: Islam: Who, What, How: https://livefreedom.net/islam-who-what-how.html

Expand full comment

Maybe we could make a more effective movie with the same data - a fast-paced hard-hitting thriller!

Expand full comment